ndsavla
Trademark Rectification Services | Savlana Init
Trademark · Rectification

Trademark Rectification — Correcting or Contesting the Register.

Rectification is how the Register itself gets corrected — removing a wrongly entered mark, updating an error, or challenging a registration that shouldn't have been granted.

Contact Us

Rectification under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act covers two distinct situations: an owner seeking to correct an error or omission in their own registered entry (such as an address or ownership detail that's out of date), and a third party (an 'aggrieved person') petitioning to cancel or vary another party's registered mark on grounds such as non-use for a continuous period, the entry having been made without sufficient cause, or the registration otherwise being wrongly on the Register.

Non-use rectification is one of the most common contested scenarios — if a registered mark hasn't been used for the goods/services it covers for a continuous period of five years and three months from the date registration was completed, an aggrieved third party can petition to have it removed, freeing up the mark for others to potentially register.

We handle rectification from both sides: filing a petition on behalf of a party seeking to correct or cancel an entry, and defending an existing registration against a rectification petition filed by a third party, including compiling use evidence to counter a non-use claim.

Our Rectification Services

Own-Entry Correction Filing

Filing to correct an error or update details (such as address or ownership) in your own registered trademark entry.

Non-Use Rectification Petition (Offensive)

Filing a rectification petition to cancel a third party's registered mark on grounds of continuous non-use.

Non-Use Rectification Defence

Defending an existing registration against a non-use rectification petition, including compiling use evidence.

Wrongful Entry Rectification Petition

Filing a petition to remove a mark registered without sufficient cause or in violation of the Act's provisions.

Aggrieved Person Standing Assessment

Assessing whether a party has the requisite standing as an 'aggrieved person' to file a rectification petition.

Counter-Statement to Rectification Petition

Drafting the counter-statement responding to a rectification petition filed against a registered mark.

Use Evidence Compilation

Compiling sales, advertising, and market-use evidence to demonstrate genuine use of a challenged mark.

Rectification Hearing Support

Preparation and representation where a rectification petition proceeds to a Registry or IPD hearing.

Our Process

1

Situation Assessment

We assess whether the matter is a correction of your own entry, an offensive petition against another mark, or a defence against one filed against you.

2

Grounds & Standing Review

For offensive petitions, the specific ground (non-use, wrongful entry) and the petitioner's standing are reviewed.

3

Petition or Counter-Statement Drafting

A rectification petition or a counter-statement (as applicable) is drafted addressing the specific grounds.

4

Evidence Compilation

Use evidence or supporting documentation is compiled depending on whether the matter involves a non-use claim.

5

Filing & Hearing Follow-Through

The filing is submitted and the matter is tracked through to any scheduled hearing and decision.

Why It Matters

Correction filings handled promptly for errors in your own registered entry
Non-use petitions built on properly assessed grounds and standing
Existing registrations defended with systematically compiled use evidence
Counter-statements address the specific rectification ground raised
Hearing preparation included where the petition proceeds that far
Clear guidance on which side of a rectification matter you're on and what it needs
Reduces risk of losing a valuable mark to an unanswered non-use claim
Supports cleaning up genuinely stale or wrongly registered marks blocking your filing

Frequently Asked Questions

Rectification is the legal process for correcting, cancelling, or varying an entry on the Register of Trade Marks under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act — it covers both an owner correcting their own entry's details and a third party petitioning to cancel another party's registration on specific grounds.
If a registered mark hasn't genuinely been used for the goods/services it covers for a continuous period of five years and three months from the completion of registration, an aggrieved person can file a rectification petition seeking its removal from the Register on non-use grounds.
Only a person with standing as an 'aggrieved person' — generally someone whose own trademark interests are genuinely affected by the existing registration, such as being blocked from registering a similar mark because of it.
By compiling and filing evidence of genuine use of the mark during the relevant period — sales records, invoices, advertising materials, and market presence — that demonstrates the mark hasn't actually been abandoned or left unused.
If the competitor's mark is genuinely vulnerable — for example, due to prolonged non-use or having been wrongly registered — a rectification petition can be a legitimate route to clear the blocking registration, provided you have the requisite standing as an aggrieved person.
No — opposition challenges a mark before it's registered, during the post-publication window. Rectification challenges (or corrects) a mark that's already on the Register, which is why the grounds and procedure differ between the two.

Need to correct, defend, or challenge a Register entry?

Tell us which side of the rectification matter you're on — we'll assess the grounds and standing and handle the filing.