ndsavla
Investment Support Services for Gratuity Trusts | Savlana Init
Gratuity Trust · Investment Support

Investment Support — Corpus Invested Within the Rules.

An approved gratuity fund's corpus can't just sit anywhere — investments must follow the prescribed pattern for such funds. We advise trustees and monitor allocation against those rules.

Contact Us

Approved gratuity funds are required to invest their corpus in line with an investment pattern prescribed for such funds, broadly aligned with the pattern applicable to provident and superannuation funds — a mix of government securities, debt instruments, and other permitted categories, with defined allocation ranges. This isn't discretionary; it's a condition tied to the fund's approved status, and deviating materially from the prescribed pattern is a compliance issue independent of investment performance.

In practice, most gratuity trust corpus is held through an insurer's group gratuity policy, where the insurer manages the underlying investment within its own regulated fund options — but trustees still carry the responsibility of selecting an appropriate fund option and confirming, at least at a high level, that the underlying allocation is consistent with what's required for an approved fund.

We support trustees with this — reviewing the trust's current investment/fund option against the prescribed pattern, coordinating with the insurer on allocation reporting, and flagging where the trust's investment approach needs trustee attention or a formal decision.

Our Investment Support Services

Investment Pattern Compliance Review

Reviewing the trust's current investment allocation against the pattern prescribed for approved gratuity funds.

Insurer Fund Option Advisory

Advising trustees on selecting an appropriate insurer fund option consistent with prescribed allocation norms.

Allocation Reporting Coordination

Coordinating periodic allocation reports from the insurer/fund manager for trustee review.

Deviation Flagging & Correction Advisory

Flagging where current allocation has drifted from the prescribed pattern and advising on correction.

Trustee Investment Decision Documentation

Drafting trustee resolutions documenting investment-related decisions for the fund.

Multi-Insurer/Fund-Manager Comparison

Comparing available insurer or fund manager options where trustees are considering a change.

Regulatory Update Tracking

Tracking changes to the prescribed investment pattern rules and advising trustees accordingly.

Annual Investment Review Support

Supporting the annual review of the trust's investment approach alongside the actuarial valuation cycle.

Our Process

1

Current Allocation Review

We obtain the trust's current investment/fund allocation from the insurer or fund manager for review.

2

Prescribed Pattern Comparison

The current allocation is compared against the prescribed investment pattern for approved gratuity funds.

3

Deviation Assessment

Any deviation is assessed for materiality and discussed with trustees for a correction decision if needed.

4

Trustee Decision & Documentation

Trustees formally decide on any allocation change, documented through a resolution.

5

Ongoing Monitoring

Allocation is reviewed periodically (typically annually) as part of the trust's regular compliance cycle.

Why It Matters

Investment allocation checked against prescribed norms, not assumed compliant
Trustees supported in selecting an appropriate insurer fund option
Deviations flagged early rather than discovered during a compliance review
Investment decisions properly documented through trustee resolutions
Regulatory changes to prescribed patterns tracked and advised on proactively
Comparison support if trustees are evaluating a change of insurer/fund manager
Annual investment review folded into the existing actuarial compliance cycle
Reduces risk of approved status being questioned over investment non-compliance

Frequently Asked Questions

No — approved gratuity funds must follow a prescribed investment pattern (broadly similar to that applicable to provident and superannuation funds), with defined categories and allocation ranges. This is a condition of maintaining approved status, not a discretionary investment choice.
Yes, in principle — while the insurer manages the underlying investment operationally, trustees retain responsibility for selecting a fund option consistent with the prescribed pattern and for satisfying themselves the arrangement remains compliant, even if the day-to-day management is outsourced.
A material, uncorrected deviation is a compliance issue that could be relevant if the trust's approved status is ever reviewed, independent of how the investment has actually performed — which is why periodic checking against the prescribed pattern matters, not just fund performance.
At least annually is standard practice, often aligned with the actuarial valuation cycle, though trustees should also review promptly if there's a change of insurer, fund manager, or a significant regulatory update to the prescribed investment pattern.
Yes, trustees can decide to move the trust's funding arrangement to a different insurer or fund manager, though this needs to be documented through a trustee resolution and coordinated carefully to ensure continuity of coverage during the transition.
It's prescribed under rules issued by the relevant regulatory/tax framework governing approved funds, and can be updated from time to time — we track these updates so trustees aren't relying on outdated allocation norms.

Not sure your trust's investments meet the prescribed pattern?

We'll review your current allocation against the rules and flag anything trustees need to act on.